Questions
& Answers About The
Master
Planning Process
What
brought this issue up?
Church
members have recognized for decades the pressing need to improve the
physical structure of the church with respect to accessibility to
bathrooms, classrooms, the fellowship hall and the building as a whole.
There are also questions related to emerging trends in worship,
fellowship patterns, Christian education, and child care. Last summer
the Session and Board of Trustees appointed an ad hoc committee to
address these concerns. The ad hoc committee began the process of
thoroughly evaluating the building and physical plant needs of the
church.
What
were the findings of this ad hoc committee?
The
members of this committee did an audit of our building. They determined
that the church structure had several pressing problems.
What
were the solutions that this committee recommended?
Because
we lack the in-house expertise to evaluate all of the complex problems
we face, the committee recommends that a comprehensive professional
study of our building needs be undertaken by a local architectural firm.
What
did this ad hoc committee ultimately recommend?
They
recommended that the session employ an architectural firm to study our
facility, gather information from members about our needs, and finally,
give us advice on how we should proceed.
What
was the session's reaction to this recommendation?
The
session received the report of the committee and heard a presentation
from the architectural firm. After
careful deliberation the session voted to approve the proposal
contingent upon the successful completion of a campaign to raise the
$7500 need to pay for the study.
Why
is bathroom accessibility an issue?
Many
members of and visitors to this congregation are not able to use the
restroom facilities because of physical infirmities. They simply do not
have the physical ability to negotiate the stairs to use the restrooms.
Are
there other access issues?
Yes,
many are prohibited from enjoying the pleasures of Sunday coffee and
fellowship because they cannot make it down the stairway to the
fellowship hall.
What
is it that the session is recommending that the congregation support?
The
session accepted the ad hoc building committees recommendation. An
architectural firm, Shultz & Torgerson Architects, LTD., a local
firm with considerable experience in church building projects, was asked to
submit a proposal. The session is asking the congregation to support
contracting with Shultz & Torgerson to develop a "Master
Plan" for the church.
What
did Shultz & Torgerson Architects, LTD. propose?
They
outlined the following plan to the session:
What
would this Master Plan contain?
The
Master Plan would recommend several courses of action with various price tags. Options would range from the
absolute minimum needed to sustain the present structure to a relatively
ambitious plan which would call for major building additions and
upgrades. The Master Plan would contain cost estimates as well as two
and three dimensional models for these various
building scenarios.
How
much money will Shultz & Torgerson Architects, LTD. charge us for
developing this Master Plan?
$7500.
Our
obligations for church accessibility for our elderly and infirmed members
seems clear, but what about our responsibility to non-members and the
community at large?
Our
purpose in life is to glorify God and we can do that in two ways: by living our life in a manner pleasing to God, and by
extending the Good News of his grace to those outside the church. In
order to do the latter, we have to have a building which is inviting to
non-members. We have to demonstrate to the person on the street that
they are welcome in our fellowship. Because of the present deficiencies
in the building structure we cannot honestly extend the welcome mat to
all the people of our community. We must find ways to solve this
problem. The development of a Master Building Plan is the
first step in meeting our responsibility to spread the Good News.
Home
Top